<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The home of fiction writer, Val Gryphin..... &#187; Rejections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.valgryphin.com/tag/rejections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.valgryphin.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rejections&#8230;and assumed rejections</title>
		<link>http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/05/rejections-and-assumed-rejections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/05/rejections-and-assumed-rejections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NaNoWriMo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assumed Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valgryphin.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my year-end review I mentioned a piece that I marked on Duotrope as an &#8220;assumed rejection.&#8221; Being the person I am, I don&#8217;t like loose ends, such as stories I don&#8217;t hear back on. Before this group I am about to talk about, I had only two long-time stories, and they were LONG &#8211; <a href='http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/05/rejections-and-assumed-rejections/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my year-end review I mentioned a piece that I marked on Duotrope as an &#8220;assumed rejection.&#8221; Being the person I am, I don&#8217;t like loose ends, such as stories I don&#8217;t hear back on. Before this group I am about to talk about, I had only two long-time stories, and they were LONG &#8211; one was 562 days, and one was 374. I never heard back on the first one and the second I finally got a rejection. I also had one that went 205 days, but with that magazine it was expected &#8211; plus it was a mail submission and a mail rejection which always takes longer. Other than those all of my responses have been under 90 days, with the exception of six that were between 100-139 days, and two that were in the 180&#8242;s (and those two I was kept up to date on when to expect an answer by.) So all of those I didn&#8217;t stress over.</p>
<p>But this year I had 3 stories go out and go over 200 days. One, the longest, I emailed inquiring if it was still under consideration, and received a quick reply letting me know it was. So, even though it is still going a long time, I&#8217;m not worried about it, as I know it isn&#8217;t lost.</p>
<p>The other two however, have me a wee bit irked, only because I don&#8217;t like marking assumed rejections, even when I feel they must be. Both I emailed over a month ago to inquire about, and neither responded. One I hadn&#8217;t received a conformation email for submitting, so at 200 days I reluctantly marked it AR. The other one I did receive a conformation email, but no response to the inquiry email. Tomorrow that one will be at 200 days as well, and I will probably mark it as an AR, but it irks me more than a rejection does. (I&#8217;m used to those.)</p>
<p>So this year so far, I have submitted two pieces, and already received a rejection for one. Go new year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/05/rejections-and-assumed-rejections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year-end Recap</title>
		<link>http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/04/yearend-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/04/yearend-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100 Words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acceptances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Sheets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duotrope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicroHorror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moving on Nightfall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NaNoWriMo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valgryphin.com/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before I go into my year-end statistics overview, a happy announcement. I had two stories go live last month, &#8220;Tumbleweeds and Highways” was published in Clean Sheets. “Web of Death” was published in MicroHorror. I also finished the month on 100 Words which you can read at Val Gryphin&#8217;s December Batch. Go check them out <a href='http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/04/yearend-recap/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I go into my year-end statistics overview, a happy announcement. I had two stories go live last month,</p>
<p>&#8220;<a  href="http://www.cleansheets.com/fiction/gryphin_12.17.08.shtml" target="_blank">Tumbleweeds and Highways</a>” was published in <a  href="http://www.cleansheets.com/" target="_blank">Clean Sheets.</a></p>
<p>“<a  href="http://www.microhorror.com/microhorror/author/val-gryphin/web-of-death/" target="_blank">Web of Death</a>” was published in <a  href="http://www.microhorror.com/">MicroHorror</a>.</p>
<p>I also finished the month on <a  href="http://100words.com/" target="_blank">100 Words</a> which you can read at <a  href="http://100words.com/batchReadBatchMember.php?batch=115&#038;member=7527" target="_blank">Val Gryphin&#8217;s December Batch.</a></p>
<p>Go check them out and if you have any comments feel free to leave them for me.</p>
<p>Go! Shoo! Then you can come back and read my stats!</p>
<p>Now, where were we. Ah yes.</p>
<p>In the year 2008, (According to my lovely <a  href="http://duotrope.com/" target="_blank">Duotrope</a>) I had 74 new submissions to 57 different markets, on 17 different pieces, with 11 submissions still out for consideration.</p>
<p>Of those 63 completed submissions I had 48 rejections:</p>
<ul>
<li>* 1 assumed rejection</li>
<li>* 7 personal rejections</li>
<li>* 40 form rejections</li>
</ul>
<p>I also:</p>
<ul>
<li>* had 1 rewrite request</li>
<li>* withdrew 7 submissions</li>
</ul>
<p>And, (the best part) I received 7 acceptances, of which 3 have gone to print.</p>
<p>Other interesting facts:</p>
<ul>
<li>* the shortest response time was 0 days</li>
<li>* the longest one is still out at 216 days</li>
<li>* the next is an assumed rejection at 200 days (yes, I had emailed to check on it.)</li>
<li>* the longest actual rejection was 189 days</li>
<li>* of the acceptances, I had one that was 0 days and one that was 127</li>
<li>* the piece that went out the most went out 13 times so far (and still not accepted!)</li>
</ul>
<p>Overall I consider it a very successful year. I met agents and learned more about the business at a writer&#8217;s conference, and developed an elevator pitch I was able to give to an agent I respected. I was also requested to send the first 100 pages of my novel, which, even though it was rejected, was a great experience. I completed both <a  href="http://www.nanowrimo.org/" target="_blank">NaNoWriMo</a> and a month of 100 Words. I did a hard revision on <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Moving on Nightfall</span> and am 2/3rds of the way through my second novel.</p>
<p>Yes, overall, it very good writing year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/04/yearend-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another acceptance</title>
		<link>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/10/29/another-acceptance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/10/29/another-acceptance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acceptances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston Literary Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NaNoWriMo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.valgryphin.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Houston Literary Review has accepted my long poem, Eulogy for Life. And in that time period between this and my last acceptance I have also received 1o rejections. And I have 8 stories out to 15 markets. AND! NaNoWriMo starts in about 48 hours! I&#8217;ll be blogging my progress heh heh heh. I am <a href='http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/10/29/another-acceptance/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://thehoustonliteraryreview.com/" target="_blank">The Houston Literary Review</a> has accepted my long poem, Eulogy for Life.</p>
<p>And in that time period between this and my last acceptance I have also received 1o rejections.</p>
<p>And I have 8 stories out to 15 markets.</p>
<p>AND! <a  href="http://www.nanowrimo.org/" target="_blank">NaNoWriMo </a>starts in about 48 hours! I&#8217;ll be blogging my progress heh heh heh. I am invoking the <a  href="http://www.zokutou.co.uk/theclause.html" target="_blank">Zokutou Clause</a> as I have won NaNo before, and will be rewriting and continuing the one I started in 2003 &#8211; it is at 33k, but my writing has improved and there are some changes I want to make. I&#8217;m also shooting for 70k words rather than 50k &#8211; which means I am shooting for writing 2334 words a day. Yikes. I&#8217;ve been busting ass for a while writing though, so I&#8217;m going to try like hell to pull it off.</p>
<p>*starts sweating already*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/10/29/another-acceptance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleaning up</title>
		<link>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/09/22/cleaning-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/09/22/cleaning-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acceptances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruthie's Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.valgryphin.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I spent yesterday smoothing out the site. The text should now be consistent overall, I changed the way the links highlight on mouse over, all my contact information is now in one spot &#8211; and look over there &#60;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; there is a page with links to my publishing credits I&#8217;m anal about going on <a href='http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/09/22/cleaning-up/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I spent yesterday smoothing out the site. The text should now be consistent overall, I changed the way the links highlight on mouse over, all my contact information is now in one spot &#8211; and look over there<br />
&lt;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; there is a page with links to my publishing credits <img src='http://www.valgryphin.com/fileswp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;m anal about going on over and over until it looks like I want it to, and I think for now that I&#8217;m happy with it. The only thing that I don&#8217;t like is the &#8220;Main&#8221; and &#8220;Publications&#8221; links over there, but I am going to make a couple of graphics for them, so the text links will remain for now. Any comments on the site design are welcome.</p>
<p>I also edited my Twitter box so it doesn&#8217;t take up so much room. I have it partly so people can have another way to follow my posts as this blog pings Twitter whenever there is a new post.</p>
<p>I had another short story accepted, this one by <a  href="http://www.ruthiesclub.com/" target="_blank">Ruthie&#8217;s Club</a>, titled &#8220;Winter Showers.&#8221; I also have received 8 rejections this month, which brings my total this year to 27. I currently have 18 stories out.</p>
<p>And in non-writing news, my daughter has the chicken pox. She had recieved one of the shots in the 2 shot series so far, so even though she tends to catch anything like that very severely, she has a mild case with just bumps and itching. She&#8217;s quite pleased however that this means she doesn&#8217;t have to have the second shot after this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/09/22/cleaning-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More statististics and a rejection letter</title>
		<link>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/09/12/more-statististics-and-a-rejection-letter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/09/12/more-statististics-and-a-rejection-letter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submission tracking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.valgryphin.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Iâ€™ve mentioned a couple of acceptances Iâ€™ve had this week, and the ones I have pending. Now, to put that into context a little bit, since May 1st, also I have submitted 15 stories that were rejected, and withdrawn 1 (Because it was accepted by Clean Sheets.) So, since May 1st that is 39 <a href='http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/09/12/more-statististics-and-a-rejection-letter/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Iâ€™ve mentioned a couple of acceptances Iâ€™ve had this week, and the ones I have pending. Now, to put that into context a little bit, since May 1<sup>st</sup>, also I have submitted 15 stories that were rejected, and withdrawn 1 (Because it was accepted by Clean Sheets.)</p>
<p>So, since May 1st that is</p>
<p>39 submissions,<br />
21 of which are pending,<br />
15 rejected,<br />
2 accepted<br />
and 1 withdrawn.</p>
<p>Not bad percentages, but still, a lot of work â€“ the acceptances donâ€™t come easy. And I am NOT complaining at all LOL.</p>
<p>And hereâ€™s a new personal rejection letter:</p>
<blockquote><p>â€œThank you for your interest. We have included below our editors&#8217; comments on your work; we hope you find them useful.</p>
<p>Editor 1 Vote: No. Over the top, dramatic, contrivance.<br />
Editor 2 Vote: No. I don&#8217;t understand what happened, who these people are, or why I should care about them.â€</p></blockquote>
<p>Owch! Good to hear, but still, Owch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/09/12/more-statististics-and-a-rejection-letter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We like you&#8230; but not enough</title>
		<link>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/16/we-like-you-but-not-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/16/we-like-you-but-not-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/16/we-like-you-but-not-enough/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the stories I submitted last year went to an online magazine, and let me tell you that was an up and down ride. The first email I got was this: We&#8217;re delighted to let you know that your story, &#8220;Short Story,&#8221; has just been accepted for its second step in our selection process. <a href='http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/16/we-like-you-but-not-enough/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the stories I submitted last year went to an online magazine, and let me tell you that was an up and down ride.</p>
<p>The first email I got was this:</p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;re delighted to let you know that your story, &#8220;Short Story,&#8221; has just been accepted for its second step in our selection process. Each of our editors will evaluate your story and we&#8217;ll make a final decision as to whether or not we&#8217;ll be able to accept it for publication.  This happens for less than 10% of our submissions.<br />&#8230;<br />You should hear back from us within one month.</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>Then a few weeks later&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Our editorial review of your truly lovely, delicate story, &#8220;Short Story,&#8221; has been completed. Unfortunately, we won&#8217;t be able to use your piece at this time.</p>
<p>Once again, though, we liked your work. Please be aware that only a small percentage of the stories submitted to us ever make it to the &#8216;second step&#8217; stage where we&#8217;ve been considering your story, and only 52 can be published within the framework of our weekly schedule each year.</p>
<p>We genuinely look forward to seeing more of your work in the near future.</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>Wow, that was a let down, let me tell you, particularly since this particular editor really did seem to like the piece. Happily, it later was published in a different market  <img src='http://www.valgryphin.com/fileswp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/16/we-like-you-but-not-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When is it time to withdraw a submission?</title>
		<link>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/08/when-is-it-time-to-withdraw-a-submission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/08/when-is-it-time-to-withdraw-a-submission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duotrope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Literal Latte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Withdrawals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/08/when-is-it-time-to-withdraw-a-submission/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have had a submission out to the &#8220;Slow Magazine&#8221; (not the real name obviously!) for quite a while &#8211; since February of 2007 as a matter of fact. This particular piece is a long poem, which they specifically state they like in their guidelines. Because I am anal (and my handwriting sucks!) I had <a href='http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/08/when-is-it-time-to-withdraw-a-submission/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a submission out to the &#8220;Slow Magazine&#8221; (not the real name obviously!) for quite a while &#8211; since February of 2007 as a matter of fact. This particular piece is a long poem, which they specifically state they like in their guidelines. Because I am anal (and my handwriting sucks!) I had printed labels for both the to and return envelopes, I included postage for a reply, and dropped it in the mail slot. (Well, really, I gave it to to post office lady over the counter, if we are going to be specific.) Although I have a tendency to go over my <a  href="http://duotrope.com/" target="_blank">Duotrope </a>tracker and see how long my submissions have been out, I really don&#8217;t stress over them, well, until they get to a year or so, and then I start to wonder.</p>
<p>I have one other story that has been out for a year, to <a  href="http://www.bust.com/" target="_blank">BUST Magazine</a>. However, in this case, as it was an electronic submission, I shot them off a polite email in December inquiring about the status of my submission:</p>
<blockquote><p>I am writing to inquire about a submission for your &#8220;One-Handed Read&#8221; I sent in February of this year, &#8220;Story Title.&#8221; I was wondering if I could find out if it was still in the consideration process?</p>
<p>Thank you very much for your reply &#8211; I appreciate your taking the time to let me know.</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>I very promptly received an email reply that stated:</p>
<blockquote><p>thanks for contacting BUST! It is still in our folder for consideration.</p>
<p>thanks again</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>So, I know they still have the story, it is still in consideration, and while I will still look at it in my submission tracker, I&#8217;ll be waiting a while to inquire again. It is a glossy mag, and I can wait to hear <img src='http://www.valgryphin.com/fileswp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>However, my submission to the &#8220;Slow Magazine&#8221; is a different story. Part of that story is its dismal Duotrope stats. Of the 26 responses that have been reported, over half were assumed rejections and withdrawals, and of the assumed rejections, the average time was almost <em>400</em> days. Yowsers. If you know <a  href="http://duotrope.com/" target="_blank">Duotrope</a>, you know those are some sucky stats. Now granted, I did look at those numbers, and wonder if I should attempt it, but I figured what the hey, long poems are harder to find markets for, and who knows, it might get in there.</p>
<p>Yeah.</p>
<p>So, while years ago I did have a non-responsive email-submitted market (<a  href="http://duotrope.com/market_343.aspx" target="_blank">Literal Latte</a> &#8211; which is also on Duotrope&#8217;s list of <a  href="http://duotrope.com/rtstats.aspx" target="_blank">low-responsive markets </a>- they didn&#8217;t respond to a follow-up email either), I hadn&#8217;t yet encountered a snail-mail submission market that not only hadn&#8217;t responded, but had such low response stats. I looked all over their website, and couldn&#8217;t find an email where I could even ask about inquiring about my submission. So, I thought about it, and sent them a snail-mail inquiry (on printed envelopes, with postage on the return envelope as well), and I said:</p>
<blockquote><p>I am writing to inquire about the status of a long poem that I submitted to the &#8220;Slow Magazine&#8221; on February, 26th, 2007, titled &#8220;This Long Poem.&#8221; I would like to know if this piece is still being considered, or if it was lost in the mail. If I have not heard of the status by April 1, 2008, I will be withdrawing it from consideration and submitting it elsewhere. Enclosed is an SASE for your reply.</p>
<p>Thank you for your time in replying to this inquiry.</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>Now, hopefully I will have heard from them one way or the other by April, but if not I have it put it writing that I will be withdrawing it. Then I will revise it again as I haven&#8217;t looked at it in over a year, and send it back out.</p>
<p>Somewhere with better stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/08/when-is-it-time-to-withdraw-a-submission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rejection Letter Time</title>
		<link>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/06/another-rejection-letter-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/06/another-rejection-letter-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rejections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/06/another-rejection-letter-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one I found interesting, partially because it reminds me of &#8220;American Idol.&#8221; Maybe they could call it, &#8220;American Author.&#8221; &#8220;Thank you for your submission to Our Magazine. We&#8217;ve decided it doesn&#8217;t work for us, however. Following are some of the editorial comments for your consideration. I hope you will consider us again in the <a href='http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/06/another-rejection-letter-2/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one I found interesting, partially because it reminds me of &#8220;American Idol.&#8221; Maybe they could call it, &#8220;American Author.&#8221;</p>
<hr />
<p>&#8220;Thank you for your submission to Our Magazine. We&#8217;ve decided it doesn&#8217;t work for us, however. Following are some of the editorial comments for your consideration. I hope you will consider us again in the future.</p>
<p>EDITOR 1: No. This is an intriguing scene, but without some knowledge of the characters involved, it&#8217;s hard to build suspense.</p>
<p>EDITOR 2: No. Too short and lacking enough details for the reader to care either way.</p>
<p>EDITOR 6: No. Who is she? What&#8217;s going on and how did she get into this predicament?</p>
<p>EDITOR 11: No. Not enough here.&#8221;</p>
<hr />
<p>Good thing Simon wasn&#8217;t one of the editors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/02/06/another-rejection-letter-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another rejection letter</title>
		<link>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/01/29/another-rejection-letter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/01/29/another-rejection-letter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/01/29/another-rejection-letter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Dear Val: Many thanks for sending &#8220;Your Story&#8221; my way. I found your story to be well-written with good description and believable dialog. You did a nice job slowly revealing what was going on, and building sympathy for our killer. The only qualm I had with the writing was the use of &#8220;began&#8221; in the <a href='http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/01/29/another-rejection-letter/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dear Val:</p>
<p>Many thanks for sending &#8220;Your Story&#8221; my way.  I found your story to be well-written with good description and believable dialog.  You did a nice job slowly revealing what was going on, and building sympathy for our killer.</p>
<p>The only qualm I had with the writing was the use of &#8220;began&#8221; in the story.  Began is a very passive word that can usually be eliminated from a story.  If you think about it, you can only &#8220;begin&#8221; to do something for a nano second before you&#8217;re actually doing it.  Why use &#8220;he began to shake&#8221; when you can write &#8220;he shook&#8221;.  Unless something is going to stop him from shaking, the word has not point.  Again, this is not a big issue, just something small to improve on.</p>
<p>I though that the conclusion of the tale was well done in that it was both horrific, yet poignant.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I tend to shy away from accepting revenge pieces.  Although your story is very well written, the main point of it is to show someone getting violent revenge on someone who wronged him.  As a result, there was never any doubt in my mind how the story would end.  I tend to receive a lot of these stories and, as much as I may enjoy them, they rarely offer anything original.  You&#8217;re tale is by far one of the best of these types of stories I&#8217;ve read, but it really didn&#8217;t have any twists or turns.  As a result, I&#8217;m going to pass.</p>
<p>The above comments represent only one person&#8217;s opinion; another editor may completely disagree.  &#8220;Your Story&#8221; is a good story that I&#8217;m sure another market will appreciate.</p>
<p>Best of luck in all of your writing endeavors,</p>
<p>The Editor&#8221;</p>
<p>Now THIS was a nice rejection letter.  Not only did he like it (even though he didn&#8217;t want to publish it) but he also offered some constructive criticism. (The only thing that really could have made it better would to have actually published it  <img src='http://www.valgryphin.com/fileswp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' />   )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/01/29/another-rejection-letter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rejection letters â€“ the Bane of a writerâ€™s existence.</title>
		<link>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/01/24/rejection-letters-%e2%80%93-the-bane-of-a-writer%e2%80%99s-existence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/01/24/rejection-letters-%e2%80%93-the-bane-of-a-writer%e2%80%99s-existence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acceptances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glimmer Train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khimairal Ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters from Hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/01/24/rejection-letters-%e2%80%93-the-bane-of-a-writer%e2%80%99s-existence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But I love them. Well, maybe not love, but close. I feel like every rejection letter I get is a letter closer to an acceptance. I have a stack of them, I donâ€™t throw them away, perhaps because I feel like having them is a physical symbol that I â€œam a Writerâ€ as it were. <a href='http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/01/24/rejection-letters-%e2%80%93-the-bane-of-a-writer%e2%80%99s-existence/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I love them. Well, maybe not love, but close. I feel like every rejection letter I get is a letter closer to an acceptance. I have a stack of them, I donâ€™t throw them away, perhaps because I feel like having them is a physical symbol that I â€œam a Writerâ€ as it were. In this age of online submission, now most of my rejections are electronic, which means I donâ€™t have that physical proof, but I still save every one of them. I have to say that my best rejection letter, or perhaps just my most memorable one, came from <a  href="http://www.glimmertrain.com/" target="_blank">Glimmer Train</a>, at least 7 years ago. At that time they were still doing submissions by mail, and they had a standard rejection letter, tri-folded, with three check boxes on the card. I believe they were , I donâ€™t remember them all, I know there was one that was basically â€œno thanks,â€ ( I was like wooo, that one would suck) a second one Iâ€™m not sure what it was, it may have been we will be publishing this, and then a third one that went along the lines of â€œThank you for sending this, weâ€™re not going to publish this, but we liked it and would like to see more.â€ They checked that box, and underlined â€œlike to see moreâ€ in dark pen. Coming from one of the top-tier literary magazines that was a huge boost to my ego. Glimmer Train** is one of the best paying, most well known, hardest to get into markets. And they wanted to see more of my work.</p>
<p>*sigh*</p>
<p>I felt like my daughter did when she got <a  href="http://www.corbinbleu.com/" target="_blank">Corbin Blueâ€™s</a> (one of the hottest &#8220;tween&#8221; crushes) autograph by catching him at the back fence after a show. She was on air for days and laminated the fair ticket he signed. I felt like that. (Although, from my older, more cynical self this doesnâ€™t count as a personal rejection exactly, but it was the most personal I had received up to that point!)</p>
<p>So far in the last twelve months I have submitted twenty-nine short stories. (Perhaps obviously, several have been out more than once.) Of those, I havenâ€™t heard back on six, one was published (<a  href="http://www.bedazzledink.com/khimairal-ink/9-07issue/9-07spring.html" target="_blank">&#8220;Spring and Fall&#8221; in Khimairal Ink</a>), and the other twenty-two obviously were rejected. However, of those, five were personal rejections, which means over twenty percent were personal. (Yes I am that much of a geek.) Iâ€™m not sure what the average is, but I do know that thatâ€™s not a bad average, considering some of the publications I submit to. (I tend to aim high, perhaps I shouldnâ€™t but I do.)</p>
<p>I will post some of the personal rejection letters Iâ€™ve received over time, but there was one form letter I received that was so funny I have to post it here. It was from <a  href="http://www.valgryphin.com/wpstuff/wp-admin/Sign%20Me%20Up%20for%20My%20Subcutaneous%20Tracking%20Chip%21" target="_blank">Postcards from Hell</a>, and it went:</p>
<p>â€œVal,</p>
<p>We have subjected our victims to your story but they were not sufficiently traumatized. Your story has been consigned to the Lake of Fire. Thanks for trying Postcards from Hell. Have a nice day.</p>
<p>Minion</p>
<p>editor from hell&#8221;</p>
<p>How great is that??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valgryphin.com/2008/01/24/rejection-letters-%e2%80%93-the-bane-of-a-writer%e2%80%99s-existence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
