<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The home of fiction writer, Val Gryphin..... &#187; Assumed Rejections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.valgryphin.com/tag/assumed-rejections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.valgryphin.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rejections&#8230;and assumed rejections</title>
		<link>http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/05/rejections-and-assumed-rejections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/05/rejections-and-assumed-rejections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NaNoWriMo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assumed Rejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valgryphin.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my year-end review I mentioned a piece that I marked on Duotrope as an &#8220;assumed rejection.&#8221; Being the person I am, I don&#8217;t like loose ends, such as stories I don&#8217;t hear back on. Before this group I am about to talk about, I had only two long-time stories, and they were LONG &#8211; <a href='http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/05/rejections-and-assumed-rejections/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my year-end review I mentioned a piece that I marked on Duotrope as an &#8220;assumed rejection.&#8221; Being the person I am, I don&#8217;t like loose ends, such as stories I don&#8217;t hear back on. Before this group I am about to talk about, I had only two long-time stories, and they were LONG &#8211; one was 562 days, and one was 374. I never heard back on the first one and the second I finally got a rejection. I also had one that went 205 days, but with that magazine it was expected &#8211; plus it was a mail submission and a mail rejection which always takes longer. Other than those all of my responses have been under 90 days, with the exception of six that were between 100-139 days, and two that were in the 180&#8242;s (and those two I was kept up to date on when to expect an answer by.) So all of those I didn&#8217;t stress over.</p>
<p>But this year I had 3 stories go out and go over 200 days. One, the longest, I emailed inquiring if it was still under consideration, and received a quick reply letting me know it was. So, even though it is still going a long time, I&#8217;m not worried about it, as I know it isn&#8217;t lost.</p>
<p>The other two however, have me a wee bit irked, only because I don&#8217;t like marking assumed rejections, even when I feel they must be. Both I emailed over a month ago to inquire about, and neither responded. One I hadn&#8217;t received a conformation email for submitting, so at 200 days I reluctantly marked it AR. The other one I did receive a conformation email, but no response to the inquiry email. Tomorrow that one will be at 200 days as well, and I will probably mark it as an AR, but it irks me more than a rejection does. (I&#8217;m used to those.)</p>
<p>So this year so far, I have submitted two pieces, and already received a rejection for one. Go new year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valgryphin.com/2009/01/05/rejections-and-assumed-rejections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
